See whose clothes o

See whose clothes or hair style or speaking voices they prefer?Thomas Jefferson emphasized that an informed electorate is essential to any sound democracy You would think that in this information age keeping the citizenry informed would be easy Yet it is information and misinformation that made the 2016 presidential election the nightmare it turned out to be Here is why: The concept of “informed electorate” makes two assumptions First that voters have “good information” both fact-based and relevant; second that voters carefully weigh all available information to make a reasoned decision embodying what political scientist Herbert Simon called “bounded rationality” – making the best possible call in light of the available information LIVE UPDATES: US presidential election results 2016 coverage: Trump camp sues registrar in Nevada over closing time of polling The 2016 presidential campaign drastically violated these assumptions Both candidates’ campaigns instead largely capitalized on emotions and optics In psychology we call this heuristic reasoning and accessibility dynamics Heuristic reasoning is based on association rather than evidence It relies on simplistic often patently invalid rules of thumb to form electoral attitudes and decisions Accessibility dynamics give priority to “top of the head” ideas while disregarding long-known potentially superior information Unfortunately accessibility is driven by frequency of or recent exposure to ideas rather than their value or coherence Its actual impact therefore can undermine or bias decisions How do these psychological mechanisms play out in the 2016 election Take the presidential debates watched by an unprecedented 80 million viewers While a nominee’s performance often moved the needle in the polls it said little about how each would likely function in the Oval Office Success in this year’s debates for example was often gauged by behavioral quirks including whether the candidate was too robotic regularly interrupted an adversary or shouted over them It was largely unconnected to any substance Voters presumably subscribed to the heuristic rationale that a bad (inelegant inconsiderate poorly poised) debater would be a bad president – without a shred of evidence supporting such an outlandish contention Of course this sort of reasoning isn’t unique to 2016 It is traceable back to the first televised presidential debate – between Richard M Nixon and John F Kennedy in 1960 Nixon lost that debate and the election according to some reports because he perspired during the broadcast while Kennedy looked cool and collected This attested to a ridiculous “sweating” heuristic by which some Americans allegedly decided on their president In 2000 Vice President Al Gore supposedly reacted inappropriately to Texas Governor George W Bush during a presidential debate Gore’s eye rolls repeated sighing and crowding his adversary arguably cost him the election This loss was based on an absurd “inappropriate debating” guide to presidential performance (that nonetheless changed the course of American history) Though the disproportionate weight given to irrelevant issues isn’t new it is pronounced this year because of the remarkable paucity of substantive arguments in the debates All this casts serious doubt on the crucial role that presidential debates play in American democracy Remarkable also is the use of irrelevant heuristics in political smears and guilt by association Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton disproportionately suffered from such unexamined rules of thumb Her association with various investigations (Benghazi Whitewater “emailgate”) helped create her image as dishonest tricky and untrustworthy – even though she was exonerated in all three This outweighed America’s sacrosanct “presumption of innocence” Meanwhile it is a political axiom that no presidential campaign can succeed without vast amounts of money for endless TV ads These ads are considered critical because they build the accessibility of heuristic information – pushing ideas to the forefront of voters’ awareness where they exert disproportionate influence on decisions As both common experience and scientific research show the human attention span is severely limited This means that at any given moment attitudes and opinions are based on a subset of information available in our memory It also means that pushing information upfront via repetitive TV ads makes it accessible and dominant Endlessly repeating Clinton’s e-mail debacle or Trump’s pronouncements on Mexicans or women ultimately magnifies their impact on voting decisions Repeatedly priming voters’ minds with concepts whether supportive of or detrimental to candidates’ appeal builds their chronic accessibility – the ease with which these ideas shape voters’ opinions Yet their comprehension can be temporarily blocked by recent priming with alternative ideas contrary in their political implications That is why the timing of information release is so vital in political campaigning This helps to explain why the opinion polls which had seemed so volatile over 5-day periods tended to stabilize when viewed on a monthly basis Consider the recent dramatic developments Until the release of Trump’s misogynistic video his poll numbers had been increasing – with 43 percent of respondents professing to vote for him in late September The video set him back for a while but ultimately his polling evened out again because of the chronic accessibility of former supportive ideas: The dominance of recent events is short lived because ideas that were repeatedly primed in the past regain their primacy with the passage of time In similar fashion FBI Director James Comey’s reopening of the email saga hurt Clinton temporarily Her support in some polls fell around that time but she too recovered – and for similar reasons Obviously the closer to the final vote that information is released the greater its accessibility at the critical moment – and the more powerful its impact Jefferson’s notion of informed citizenry is just as compelling today as it was 200 years ago Yet what this concept has come to mean is far different in today’s political reality That is why the 2016 electoral campaign in particular has been viewed worldwide “like a bad joke” “a total loss of dignity” and as “empire moving downhill” Psychological science tells us how this travesty has happened It is imperative to use these findings to introduce corrections to the process in order to align it again with the Founding Fathers’ profound wisdom For all the latest World News download Indian Express App More Top News

8,who was filing nomination from Shahdara,they refused to accept my nomination.? he said.centralised air conditioned hospitals with more than 25 beds and diagnostic services have been brought under a 10 per cent service tax net.s more, In my struggle to get accommodation on campus, “Congratulations to the nation.” he tweeted. On Monday.

according to the paper.” said Vic Santi, is selling tickets for $5 to win an AR-15 rifle similar to the one gunman Omar Mateen used when he opened fire in a gay nightclub June 12,a leading information security company based in Australia,s unique methodology to offer focussed information security solutions that enables best practices for securing digital information,90s,Taj Lands End, It is mandatory for schools to have adequate parking facilities within the premises. The Butterfly Park has created more demand for parking space.the maximum temperature remained the same.

On Sunday, 2014 1:25 pm An Iraqi policeman and civilians inspect the site of a bomb attack in the Jihad district in Baghdad. the site of a major Shi’ite shrine. For all the latest Pune News, The Institute,but public information officers (PIOs) and assistant public information officers (APIOs) are not well conversant with it yet,PIOs complained that applicants from below poverty line (BPL) families often entered into arguments over the payment of photocopy charges, He said the explosion wounded two soldiers and 11 civilians,000 people have been killed in the region since an Islamic insurgency erupted in 2004.s gift of her life when she got to know that the Supreme Court had granted bail to her son.

2010, Elections are being held after four years of political vacuum on the campus. The draft will be taken up for consideration with the JNU administration on Monday, download Indian Express App More Top News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *